Sunday, 15 February 2015

Intentional communities with insufficient intent

Our colleagues in Bristol enquired recently as to the results of some work we did a year or so ago with a prospective housing co-operative; we had lost contact with the group, but we knew that they had been on the brink of registering. Alas, a word with the good people of Catalyst confirmed our worst fears; nothing had come of their vision or our labour.
This is not unfamiliar to us. So many times we have met with groups who seemed to have a strong, unifying vision; yet within a matter of weeks the energy is lost. So many seem to share the same dream: the big house, a few acres, employment on site in a workers coop, a few solar panels and a lot of permaculture... On every occasion, there are challenges paying the inflated costs of such rural properties, but with three or four families to share the load, there's usually a way. So what goes wrong?
Perhaps the neuroses of home ownership are part of the story; individual members hesitate over selling their homes, worry over whether they would ever get back on the housing ladder, look for ways in which funds could be released from the co-op in a hurry... Another problem is employment; making a living in any rural location is a challenge, and the early days of founding a community are the worst possible time to be starting up a small business. But often the biggest problem is in fact the heart of the project: the moral, political or spiritual purpose. At first it's a unifying factor, sure, but all too soon it becomes divisive. Turns out people cannot think or live exactly alike, no matter how hard they try. Every attempt at adopting rules, policies, creeds or manifestos ends in disillusionment.
So if you're toying with the idea of an intentional community, don't give up too easily. Don't try and design it from scratch - copy something that already works somewhere. And make it a place where everyone thinks constantly about the shared philosophy - but never, ever talks about it.